b3126044e8
- Simplify flatten_vault API to return usize instead of MigrationResult struct - Add KEEP_FOLDERS: attachments/ and _themes/ alongside type/, config/, theme/ - Use HashSet for collision tracking in unique_filename - Update wikilinks from path-based [[folder/slug]] to title-based [[slug]] - Clean up empty directories after flattening - Flatten demo-vault-v2: move all notes from type-based subfolders to root - Update smoke tests for flat vault structure - Remove migrate_to_flat_vault from repair_vault (one-time migration only) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
27 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
27 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
aliases: ["Review team compensation packages"]
|
|
Is A: Task
|
|
Belongs to: "[[25q2]]"
|
|
Status: Done
|
|
Owner: "[[person-luca-rossi]]"
|
|
---
|
|
# Review team compensation packages
|
|
|
|
With the business growing steadily and approaching €17k MRR, it was time to review compensation for [[person-sara-ricci]] and [[person-paco-furiani]] to ensure it remained fair and competitive. Both had taken on expanded responsibilities since their initial agreements, and the business could afford modest increases without impacting profitability targets.
|
|
|
|
The review also considered whether to introduce performance-based bonuses tied to specific business metrics, which could align incentives more directly with the [[2025-reach-22k-mrr]] and [[2025-reach-85k-subscribers]] goals.
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance criteria
|
|
|
|
- [x] Benchmark current compensation against market rates for similar roles in the indie content business space
|
|
- [x] Propose updated compensation packages for [[person-sara-ricci]] and [[person-paco-furiani]]
|
|
- [x] Design a performance bonus structure tied to quarterly business metrics
|
|
- [x] Discuss proposals individually with each team member and finalize
|
|
- [x] Update employment/contractor agreements with new terms
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Both Sara and Paco received a 12% base increase, reflecting expanded roles and strong business performance. The increases were within budget and still leave healthy margins.
|
|
- The performance bonus structure: Paco receives a 5% commission on new sponsor revenue he directly closes; Sara receives a quarterly bonus tied to subscriber retention metrics (her editing quality directly impacts engagement and retention).
|
|
- Both team members expressed appreciation for the structured review process. Previously, compensation discussions happened reactively. Annual reviews are now scheduled as a recurring task -- see [[procedure-compensation-review]].
|