b3126044e8
- Simplify flatten_vault API to return usize instead of MigrationResult struct - Add KEEP_FOLDERS: attachments/ and _themes/ alongside type/, config/, theme/ - Use HashSet for collision tracking in unique_filename - Update wikilinks from path-based [[folder/slug]] to title-based [[slug]] - Clean up empty directories after flattening - Flatten demo-vault-v2: move all notes from type-based subfolders to root - Update smoke tests for flat vault structure - Remove migrate_to_flat_vault from repair_vault (one-time migration only) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
aliases, Is A, Belongs to, Status, Owner
| aliases | Is A | Belongs to | Status | Owner | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Task | 24q3 | Done | person-luca-rossi |
Review and update pricing page
The sponsorship pricing page had been static since the 24q1-launch-sponsorship-packages project. With six months of data on sponsor engagement and conversion rates, it was time to update the pricing to reflect the newsletter's increased value (higher subscriber count, better open rates, proven sponsor ROI). This task also involved restructuring the page to better highlight the data sponsorship tier that was being piloted.
The pricing update needed to balance maximizing revenue per sponsor with maintaining competitive positioning against other engineering newsletters in the market. person-paco-furiani conducted informal competitive research, reaching out to contacts at similar newsletters to benchmark pricing ranges.
Acceptance criteria
- Audit current pricing against competitive benchmarks from 5+ comparable newsletters
- Propose updated pricing tiers with rationale for each change
- Redesign the pricing page layout to feature the data sponsorship tier more prominently
- Add an ROI calculator or "what you get" section to justify pricing
- Update the media kit PDF to reflect new pricing
Notes
- Prices were increased by roughly 15% across all tiers. No existing sponsors complained during renewal conversations, suggesting the previous pricing may have been too low.
- The ROI calculator section proved effective -- prospects who engaged with it converted at nearly 2x the rate of those who did not.
- person-paco-furiani found that the newsletter's pricing was in the lower quartile compared to peers with similar audience sizes. Room for further increases in 2025.