---
type: ADR
id: "0001"
title: "Short decision title"
status: proposed        # proposed | active | superseded | retired
date: YYYY-MM-DD
superseded_by: "0007"  # only if status: superseded
---

## Context
What situation led to this decision? What forces and constraints are at play?

## Decision
**What was decided.** State it clearly in one or two sentences — bold so it stands out.

## Options considered
- **Option A** (chosen): brief description — pros / cons
- **Option B**: brief description — pros / cons
- **Option C**: brief description — pros / cons

## Consequences
What becomes easier or harder as a result?
What are the positive and negative ramifications?
What would trigger re-evaluation of this decision?

## Advice
*(optional)* Input received before making this decision — who was consulted, what they said, when.
Omit if the decision was made unilaterally with no external input.

Status lifecycle

proposed → active → superseded
                 ↘ retired      (decision no longer relevant, not replaced)

Rules

One decision per file
Files named NNNN-short-title.md (monotonic numbering)
Once active, never edit — supersede instead
When superseded: update status: superseded and add superseded_by: "NNNN"
ARCHITECTURE.md reflects the current state (active decisions only)

Index

ID	Title	Status
0001	Tauri v2 + React as application stack	active
0002	Filesystem as the single source of truth	active
0003	Single note open at a time (no tabs)	active
0004	Vault vs app settings for state storage	active
0005	Tauri v2 iOS for iPad support (vs SwiftUI rewrite)	active